Shandal System
Geological Field Exploration
Platform Unit ConverterIraq Time MachineEarth Through Time: Every Year Since 1972Land Cover Change and Urban GrowthSite ReportField Station: Position, Compass and the Ground Around YouOffline Field Survival MapOutcrop Sketch and Field DescriptionField Survey CompanionGeological Field TripsWhat Is in Front of Me? Geology CameraQuarry & Earthworks SurveyStructural & Geotechnical SurveyStereonet LabRock Mass Classification LabStratigraphic Column DesignerWorld Faults and PlatesGeological Unit FinderAutomatic Geological Cross-SectionIraq’s Mineral WealthFossil Sites ExplorerGeo-Heritage & Archaeological TourismDEM & Contour Mapping Studio2D Contour Mapping LabGeomorphological & Contour SurveySentinel-2 Spectral IndicesLineament ExtractionMineral ProspectivityASTER Mineral MappingArchaeological Site PotentialRegional Magnetic LabWell Log LabThermal Maturity & Geothermal LabVertical Electrical Sounding LabSeismic Evaluation & Building CodeSeismic Hazard ExplorerGlobal Soil PropertiesBearing Capacity of Shallow FoundationsPile CapacitySettlement and ConsolidationSlope StabilityRetaining WallsSoil LiquefactionMohr Circle & Failure EnvelopeAtterberg Limits & PlasticityGrain-Size AnalysisEngineering Soil ClassificationCompaction and CBR3-D Surface PlotterHydrochemistry Water LabHydrological Early WarningWater Through the Decades: Surface Water AtlasWatershed and Morphometry LabGroundwater Potential ZonesAir Quality MonitorGas Flaring and Air over Oil FieldsEnvironmental Monitoring & ModellingUrban Heat and Drought WatchNatural Hazards MonitorFlood Radar: Floods Through the CloudsLandslide SusceptibilityVolcanoes of the WorldKerogen Analysis LabPalynofacies Lab
Maps & Data Data hub Earth now Geo-heritage atlas
Learn Visual Lab Academy Library & journal Verify a report
About Shandal Pricing Contact
Switch light or dark theme
Geophysics · Workspace

Well Log Lab

Method & references

Shandal Geological Field Survey System · geologicalfieldsurvey.com

1

Composite log and interpretation

2

Crossplots

Layers and their interpretation

Calculate at a depth, step by step

Type a depth or tap the composite log. Every equation is written out with the readings of that depth, as worked in the lectures: gamma-ray index, shale volume, density, sonic and neutron porosity, total and effective porosity, secondary porosity, Sw, Sxo, the moveable hydrocarbon index and the hydrocarbon saturations.

3

Comparison and correlation of the loaded wells

4

Read a log from an image

Load a scan or photo of a printed log (from a report or a book). Mark two depths and the scale of the track, pick the colour of the curve, and the system traces it into readings. Hold the camera square to the page: a tilted photo skews depths.

5

Log response explorer

Choose a log and a rock or fluid: the system shows the typical reading, where it sits among the other rocks, and why the log reads so there.

6

How each log responds to rocks and fluids

Guide to well logs

Accuracy and limits of error

The calculations follow the published equations exactly; the error of the results comes from the logs themselves and from the parameters chosen. The typical measurement accuracy of the logs, from service-company specifications, and its effect:

LogTypical accuracyEffect on results
Density± 0.01–0.025 g/cm³± 0.6–1.5 porosity units
Neutron± 1 p.u. (φ < 10 %) · ± 5 % rel.Lithology and gas separation
Sonic± 1–2 µs/ft± 1 porosity unit
Deep resistivity± 2–5 %± 1–3 % in water saturation
Gamma ray± 5 % (statistical)± 0.03–0.05 in shale volume

The largest error is in the parameters, not the logs. An error of 0.2 in the cementation exponent m, or 20 % in Rw, changes water saturation by 10–20 saturation units. For every hydrocarbon layer the table of layers gives the range of Sw when m and n vary by ± 0.2, Rw by ± 20 % and porosity by ± 0.02.

Lithology: the mineral solution is checked by rebuilding the measured logs from the solved volumes; the misfit is shown in the results. A misfit above 1 (in units of the log error) means a mineral or fluid is missing from the model: change the formation setting or check for gas, coal or salt.

Permeability from the Timur equation is good to within about one order of magnitude; calibrate it with core or well tests.

Bad hole: where the caliper exceeds the bit by more than 1 inch or the density correction exceeds 0.1 g/cm³, density and neutron readings are unreliable; those levels are marked and kept out of the gas flag.

Logs read from an image: the error is about one pixel in depth and in value; the tool states it in units after tracing. Scan at 300 dpi or more and keep the page flat.